Supreme Court of Uganda Blesses Sexist Discrimination against Men in Madrama v Attorney General
In Madrama v Attorney General, Constitutional Appeal 1 of 2016, the Supreme Court accepted that different treatment between women who leave public service and men who do the same before attaining forty five years complies with article 43 of the Constitution. The court blessed a lower court ruling which held that the state can allow women who resign or otherwise leave public service to start a family or due to marriage to retain their public service pension even though they have not attained forty five years whereas men who do so for the same reason can not because of the role of women as mothers and care givers. The Court decision is absurd and wrong because if traditional roles of men are sufficient to justify more favorable treatment for men then all discrimination against women on the basis of these roles also is constitutionally justified. Consider for example, the traditional roles of men such as building a house, paying school fees, paying dowry, paying for dates, giving money to a woman, military service and many more. Given the unique contribution of men in the mentioned aspects of life we can use the Supreme Court reasoning to argue that it is Constitutional to pay men high wages, charge them lower taxes and interest rates and to allow them to inherit more land given their predominant role in building the physical home, meeting the financial needs of the family especially the children and feeding the family.
Related
- If Magistrates Courts in Uganda are less competent and more prone to corruption does it mean that the poor deserve inferior justice to the rich.
- Women Members of Parliament (MPs) in Uganda are the most egregious discrimination against men in Uganda
- The UPDF Amendment Bill 2025. A proposed compromise that could protect political opponents of the ruling party.
- How to enforce Court Orders in Uganda and by pass the Illegal Interference by RDCs and Politicians. Strengthening Judicial Independence in Uganda
- Insulting the modesty of a woman in Uganda is an unconstitutionally vague and discriminatory offense
