Corruption offense of illicit enrichment in Uganda and how to use its reverse burden of proof
The corruption offense of illicitly acquired has a reverse burden of proof which shifts the burden to prove legitimate acquisition of property or wealth to the accused person after the state has proved that the accused person lives beyond or has wealth beyond his known sources of income. It is theoretically the most important criminal offence to anti corruption agencies but for some reason the ODDP and the Inspectorate of Government have failed to utilize this important corruption offense.
- Arrest RDCs and other executive branch officers that interfere with the execution of Court orders in Uganda
- Constitutional Court is right about victims rights in holding that untainted evidence against an accused person is admissible in Faruku Muhammed and 2 others v Attorney General
- Increasing the Jurisdiction of Magistrates without enhancing their welfare is unfair, unlawful and dangerous
- Parody of Robert Kasibante v Kaguta Museveni Tibihaburwa and the Electoral Commission, Election Petition 01 of 2026.
- Ideal Amendments that should be included in the Magistrates Courts Amendment Bill 2026 of Uganda
