Corruption offense of illicit enrichment in Uganda and how to use its reverse burden of proof
The corruption offense of illicitly acquired has a reverse burden of proof which shifts the burden to prove legitimate acquisition of property or wealth to the accused person after the state has proved that the accused person lives beyond or has wealth beyond his known sources of income. It is theoretically the most important criminal offence to anti corruption agencies but for some reason the ODDP and the Inspectorate of Government have failed to utilize this important corruption offense.
- Ideal Amendments that should be included in the Magistrates Courts Amendment Bill 2026 of Uganda
- President Yoweri Kaguta Tibihaburwa Museveni is a minority President voted by only 7,946,772 (36.7%) out of 21,649,608 eligible Ugandan voters in the 2026 Presidential Elections
- Four years of IGG Beti Kamya drowned the Inspectorate of Government (IG) deeper into oblivion and irrelevancy but it Can be redeemed
- The Proposal to Make Magistrates Grade Ones Chief Magistrates is an efficient use of resources that will improve service delivery in Uganda
- If Magistrates Courts in Uganda are less competent and more prone to corruption does it mean that the poor deserve inferior justice to the rich.
